While the gimmick could elevate the upcoming WWE Hell in a Cell pay-per-view to a strong buyrate for a B-show, the concept is not winning praise from the lockerroom.
According to the Wrestling Observer Newsletter, it is on the receiving end of criticism from writers and wrestlers alike.
On the writing side, it creates a burden, as the creative team has to book three (likely consecutive) Hell in a Cell matches and find a way to make each unique, fresh and memorable.
Among wrestlers, particularly veterans, there is concern that the anti-blood rule puts a damper on the efficacy of the gimmick. There have been some bloody Cell matches before, and with blood presumably still off the table, it becomes harder to work a distinguished match.
dear sir Iam happy that randy orton got the belt from john cean but and happy that the undertaker won the belt from cm punk and happy triple h and shawn won there match with ted and cody bigmikegill61@yahoo.com
i am not happy with thr results! i wish batista and rey mysterio got the belt! Why don’t the writers once in a while make someone else win. It is startng to get boring seeing the same people winnig. I don’t like Randy Orton and why do they keep making him win! i swear this is what makes people not like WWE anymore. hire some new writers PLEASE because the writers you got
SUCK!
DX ROCKS! AND IF YOU ARE NOT DOWN WITH THAT I GOT 2 WORDS FOR YOU!
SUCK IT!